Evidence before punishment.
Renasca separates private reporting, factual findings, proportionate sanctions, and public accountability. A security signal can start a review; it cannot become an automatic verdict.
Private intake
Reports, reporter identity, raw evidence, and active investigations are restricted to authorized reviewers.
Human fact-finding
Reviewers distinguish direct observation, system telemetry, context, and disputed claims before drawing a finding.
Proportionate outcomes
Only final, public-safe sanctions within Renasca network jurisdiction enter the archive, with appeal status where applicable.
What the system will—and will not—do
Network jurisdiction
Renasca can govern participation in its own Discord, runtime, registry, events, destinations, and official programs. It is not a universal blacklist and does not claim authority over unrelated communities.
No public accusations
Submitting a report does not publish a name or create a sanctions entry.
No automated guilt
Telemetry and anti-exploit signals remain evidence for review, never an automatic punishment.
No evidence dumping
Public records explain the basis and outcome without exposing private reports, personal data, or unsafe raw evidence.
Appeals remain visible
A published sanction shows its current state and a public-safe appeal outcome when one exists.